Hoodwinking India Airtel Zero Net Neutrality
Hoodwinking India.
So, Airtel India’s boss, Mr. Gopal Vittal sends out a letter
stating that the company believes in Net Neutrality, yet feels that the Airtel
Zero platform is an empowering idea, as content providers will pay for the
customers who are unable to afford the current internet charges.
The first question from a business
perspective I have, is, why would any app developer or a site pay Airtel to get
consumers? Knowing very well they do not have a purchasing power! To me, this
does not make any sense. Unless of-course, Mr Vittal you have ulterior motives.
Prime
Minister Modi wants to see the next Google or Facebook coming from India. The
government has an ambitious plan of creating a digital India, and none of this
would be possible if we do not believe in Net Neutrality.
For
Facebook to succeed over Orkut, or Gmail over Outlook, the underlying cause was
a level playing field. The moment the service provider in conjuncture with an
app developer restricts access or penalises customers from visiting a
non-partner site or app, they are violating the principles of level playing
field and more over restricting growth of a nascent industry by creating
new entry barriers.
Whether
you call it neutrality or equality the underlying principle has to be equal
opportunity to reach end consumers, and Airtel Zero plan violates that. As a
business, one may see internet merely as social media sites, but is it really
that? Is empowering the idea of buying a product from an e-retailer, spending
hours looking at status messages on Facebook? Or is it about the accessibility
to research and learn about the world?
Mr
Vittal, our country faces enormous challenges for which we need indigenous
solutions. When the Prime Minister speaks about digital revolution, I hope he does
not intend for every Indian to be on Facebook. He probably wants to see
applications that can offer solutions to our problems.
For instance, an application that can track rural health, an app that allows doctors to know the medicines they had prescribed to patients, an app that can record observations on health parameters, and provides the same information to the Commissioners sitting in district headquarters for better rural health planning, is what we should be aiming at.
For instance, an application that can track rural health, an app that allows doctors to know the medicines they had prescribed to patients, an app that can record observations on health parameters, and provides the same information to the Commissioners sitting in district headquarters for better rural health planning, is what we should be aiming at.
Would a
developer of such an idea find place on your platform? Probably not. Earlier,
entrepreneur’s had to run behind government officials and now they'll have to
run behind telecom operators to seek approval of their product.
Yes,
there is a decline on SMS revenue, what is killing SMS is not that WhatsApp is
free, but the value addition it offers. WhatsApp has revolutionized the way
communication and business takes place across the country. I see weavers
sitting in villages 200 km away from Bangalore, sharing images of new designs,
accepting orders without having to spend time traveling to the city. I see
wholesalers getting repeated orders of
designs without having to spend 3 days waiting for a courier to arrive with the
cutting of a fabric.
This
is leading to greater efficiency in the overall system. However, Telecom
operators probably see it as loss of revenue to Transporters and Courier
companies.
Telecom
operators need to stop cribbing about falling SMS and Voice revenue and focus
on how they can provide value addition to their customers.
Also, a
parting note to COAI, I heard Mr. Rajan Mathews recently talk about OTT’s and
security threat to National Security on NDTV. He needs to get out of his cosy
world. Indian Telco’s aren’t doing anything to improve the security apparatus
of India. To my understanding, a primary expectation from security agencies is
verifiable address, and the way information is currently captured and verified
is flawed.
If COAI
really cared about National Security, I should've been getting a letter to my
registered address at least once a year with a unique code. So that my address
can be re-verified. If you really cared, you would start sending SIM
replacements by courier, so, that at least you know your customer resides at
the address he is providing you.
I hope the government steps in and stands for the cause of
Net Neutrality.
Saurabh Seth
Comments
Post a Comment